Posted: June 3, 2026
Title: Suggestions for comments to Comal County Commissioners on Cancellation of Two Lots from Summit Estates at Fischer
ALERT: Give a citizen’s comment (3 minutes) at June 4 Commissioners Court, 8:30am, 100 Main Plaza, New Braunfels
OR
write to all the commissioners well before the June 11 Public Hearing
Background: previous Update, Reply to TWC...
For everyone: Write before June 11 and/or show up at Commissioners Court June 4, where you can present a 3-minute public comment. June 4 is one week ahead of the Public Hearing on this issue; it is important to present comments early rather than wait for the hearing, otherwise Commissioners won’t have time to digest the comments before voting on June 11.
For Summit Estates at Fischer residents: Watch for info from your HOA. Write to all the commissioners and/or show up at Commissioners Court June 4, as above. When commenting, be sure to specify that you are a resident of Summit Estates at Fischer so the Commissioners will know that your objection is coming from within the subdivision. Make clear your objections to the cancellation of the lots, based on how your “established rights” as a resident are interfered with by cancellation of these lots. Perhaps (but not only) things like: an accident or malfunction at the treatment site causing problems or even danger to residents at the only entrance/exit to your subdivision; being obliged to go through a utility facility on both sides of the road to enter or exit your own subdivision; the (negative) effect on property values; unfairness to all the residents of a non-resident wanting to opportunistically cancel his lots over the objections of the HOA and the subdivision; concerns about your subdivision bearing the burden of providing water treatment for the surrounding subdivisions — the price being the utility plant at your entrance.)
Plan on also attending the June 11 Public Hearing if at all possible and give another 3-minute comment.
Considerations for general comments follow...
Addresses and phone numbers:
—————————————------
Doug Leecock: dleecock@comalcounty.gov, (830) 221-1100
Scott Haag: scotthaag@comalcounty.gov, (830) 221-1102
Kevin Webb: kwebb@comalcounty.gov, (830) 221-1103
Jen Crownover: JCrownover@comalcounty.gov, (830) 221-1104
Judge Kristen Hoyt: khoyt@comalcounty.gov, (830) 221-1105
(Please remember that you are asking the Commissioners to vote with you, so hostility is totally counter-productive.)
Notation: MGD = million gal/day
Summit Estates at Fischer = “Summit Fischer”
Why urge the Commissioners to vote NO on the cancellation of the lots from the Summit Estates at Fischer subdivision? Some considerations (write up just one or two ideas to send in, unless you're a Summit Fischer resident):
* It is the expansion of the water infrastructure, not an upgrade that seems to require TWC to build on the lots in question. TWC has not described how the plan to expand production capacity from .1MGD to 1MGD (a 1000% increase) is necessary to improve service to Summit Fischer. Neither the ten-fold production increase nor the lot cancellation that would enable it have been justified or motivated. Cancellation and a ten-fold expansion have not been demonstrated to be necessary for improved service to Summit-Fischer.
* Even an expansion might be possible without building on both sides of the entrance to Summit Fischer. A more modest production capacity than 1MGD or a smaller infrastructure footprint may well be able to provide improved service without requiring cancellation of the lots and expansion onto them. Cancellation of the lots may be unnecessary even for expansion sufficient to improve service at Summit Fischer.
* TWC says that the expanded production capacity is intended for buildout demand of Summit Fischer. (See slides.) And yet, at complete buildout on its 275 lots, Summit Fischer could only ever use 110,000 gal/day - about .1MGD, which TWC says is current production. Thus, the lot cancellation would result in a surplus water production capacity of .9MGD. Until TWC explains how such a surplus is useful, the expansion and the lot cancellation that would enable it, is unwarranted.
* While not clarified publicly, redundancy in the water system appears to be a goal. The four existing subdivisions, Rancho del Lago, the Legends, Rocky Creek Ranch, and Summit Fischer, will be tied together in an improved water system enabled by the Fir Lane Well Station project (Fir Lane in Rancho del Lago), providing improved water reliability and water pressure to the four. Thus the water treatment plant at Summit Fischer could provide water treatment and redundancy for all four existing subdivisions. However, the total number of subdivision plats from all those subdivisions is 1646 platted lots, and provisioning ALL of them would require about .66MGD. So even with 100% redundancy for all the subdivisions provided by Summit Fischer, 1MGD is still about 50% more capacity than needed for all four existing subdivisions. This surplus capacity, enough to provision about 850 homes, has not been justified. Cancellation of the lots and the resulting high production capacity are not justified, even for 100% redundancy all four existing subdivisions.
* If the production capacity of 1MGD were actually used (necessarily beyond Summit Fischer, which can only use .1MGD), it could super-charge the depletion of the Trinity Aquifer in our area, threatening wells and water supply of the entire community, even if the water came from the wells distributed among the four subdivisions. Nearby neighboring wells have already been impacted by low water in the aquifer. Suggesting that redundancy requires such high production rates relies on an inexhaustible water supply that can support those rates. Our aquifer and Canyon Lake are already stressed, and as they are depleted, water for redundancy (for surrounding wells and for subdivisions) will not come from the aquifer, and TWC has rights to only 7% of Canyon Lake water (and less in drought conditions). Better to plan for low water supplies now and not super-charge production capacity from the Trinity Aquifer or from Canyon Lake. Cancellation would enable such expansion, which is incompatible with responsible water management and sustainable growth.
* Cancellation of the lots appears to have become the means for an end run around the Summit Fischer HOA and its opposition to TWC expansion. The non-resident landowner granted TWC a blanket easement on the lots, in apparent violation of HOA restrictions, to enable the expansive TWC project. However, faced with HOA legal opposition to that new easement, the landowner is now requesting cancellation of the lots from the subdivision. It appears to be an attempt to maneuver around HOA objections. This cancellation is oppotunistic and unfair to the residents of the subdivision.
* Cancellation would set a terrible precedent, allowing a landowner who is not even a resident to cancel out of a subdivision against objections from the subdivision, in what may simply be a money-making scenario. What will stop future disgruntled or simply opportunistic landowners from similarly maneuvering around their HOA, to the detriment of other county subdivisions and their residents? The precedent of this cancellation would be detrimental to the entire county.
Voting NO on this cancellation is an opportunity for our Comal County Commissioners to stand with the community in protecting our water resources. We urge the Commissioners to vote NO.
Posted: June 3, 2026
Fischer Neighbors Reply to TWC Water Service Information Update
Link to TWC Water Service Information Update:
Fischer Neighbors replies:
There appears to be much confusion about water in this area just now! Wastewater treatment and water treatment are two different things. Wastewater permits (for treatment and discharge) are handled by Texas Commission of Environmental Quality (TCEQ); water treatment of well and reservoir water for delivery as drinking water is carried out by Texas Water Company (TWC) for its customers.
About Broken Cedar Ranch and Summit Estates at Fischer...
1)
Fischer Neighbors is working to oppose the wastewater treatment and discharge permit application by Lennar for the Broken Cedar Ranch proposed development. This application is now under consideration by TCEQ and the process is ongoing.
2)
Completely unrelated, TWC has temporarily paused 9 proposed developments in Comal County, including Broken Cedar Ranch, due to a lack of water supply. Once a water supply is found, TWC would be able to lift the pause on one or more of the developments.
3)
Interestingly, Summit Estates at Fischer (Summit-Fischer) is the site of proposed significant expansion of infrastructure (no new wells) by TWC, as described in the plan presented to residents of Summit-Fischer. (See TWC slides.) The project is said by TWC to be unrelated to Broken Cedar Ranch; however, the expansion plan itself deserves examination.
4)
In their presentation to the Summit-Fischer HOA, TWC described its infrastructure expansion plans to increase production capacity ten-fold. This is not mentioned in the TWC Update section on Recent Social Media Claims, which disavows acquiring new wells or increasing well production. Reading that section, a reader might conclude that production capacity will not increase. On the contrary, increased production, apparently in the form of increased water treatment capacity, seems to be a very important part of the project.
TWC estimates current production capacity at Summit-Fischer at .1million gal/day; a planned 1000% increase means a planned production capacity of 1 million gal/day.
· Planned production: 1 million gal/day (1MGD or 1mgd)
· At 400 gal/day per household (estimated by Comal Trinity GCD), this is enough water for 2500 homes.
· TWC's presentation to Summit-Fischer residents declared expansion plans "designed to meet the buildout demands of the Summit Fischer subdivision." (See TWC slides.)
· Summit-Fischer has ~275 lots.
· TWC's plan for water production at Summit-Fischer surpasses Summit-Fischer buildout demand by 2225 homes.
· The Broken Cedar Ranch proposal is for 850 homes in the first phase; future phases are said to be for a total of 2400 homes.
While plans for infrastructure upgrades and improved service for current residents are necessary, the proposed over-expansion of the infrastructure is exorbitant and requires a closer look.
5)
If well production does not increase at Summit Fischer, then it is presumably water treatment capacity that will increase ten-fold. Summit Fischer is destined to be connected to the water infrastructure of Ranch del Lago, the Legends, and Rocky Creek Ranch via the Fir Lane Well Station project. Thus, water from those subdivisions could be treated in the expanded water treatment plant at Summit Fischer. The water supply would then be the various wells in the four subdivisions, along with Canyon Lake water. This could indeed lead to much-improved water quality and reliability in all four subdivisions.
That said, the four subdivisions are composed of a total of 1646 subdivision plats; the number of actual houses will be somewhat less than that. Even over-counting, and again using the same estimate of 400 gal/day per household, we see that .66MGD would completely provision all four subdivisions. Redundancy and reliability would likely not require that all the four subdivisions' water pass through the Summit Fischer treatment plant, but even if it did, 1MGD is 50% over the production requirements of complete redundancy.
What then is the justification for 1MGD treatment production capacity?
6)
The HOA of Summit Estates at Fischer opposes TWC's current expansion plans and has been in continuing discussions with TWC. The (non-resident) landowner of the well lots, in apparent violation of HOA restrictions, changed TWC's original easement to a "blanket easement" to accommodate the expansion plans. The HOA opposes the change of easement that, one can reasonably conclude, would lead to 340,000 gal/day surplus production, over requirements to fully provision all four existing subdivisions.
340,000 gal/day would provision 850 additional homes. Why is this desirable? What is the motivation for a production capacity of 1MGD at Summit Fischer?
7)
The (non-resident) landowner has now petitioned Comal County Commissioners to allow him to cancel his lots in the Summit-Fischer subdivision. This resembles an end-run around the HOA, which opposes the easement changes and the resulting over-expansion of TWC infrastructure at Summit Fischer.
Posted: May 26, 2026
Title: Suggestions for comments to Comal County Commissioners on Cancellation of Two Lots from Summit Estates at Fischer
Content:
See Fischer Neighbors Reply to TWC Water Information Update (earlier update) to read more about the issue.
Write to our County Commissioners beforehand or show up at the Public Hearing at Commissioners Court June 11, 8:30am, 100 Main Plaza, New Braunfels to give a 3-minute public comment.
Addresses and phone numbers:
Doug Leecock: dleecock@comalcounty.gov, (830) 221-1100
Scott Haag: scotthaag@comalcounty.gov, (830) 221-1102
Kevin Webb: kwebb@comalcounty.gov, (830) 221-1103
Jen Crownover: JCrownover@comalcounty.gov, (830) 221-1104
Kristen Hoyt: khoyt@comalcounty.gov, (830) 221-1105
For background, see the Fischer Neighbors reply to TWC's Water Information Update on our home page.
Suggestions/ideas for comments
Please remember that you are asking them to vote with you, so hostility is totally counter-productive.
Notation: 1MGD = 1 million gal/day
We urge you to vote NO on the cancellation of the lots from the Summit Estates at Fischer subdivision. Why?
* Cancellation of the lots would allow TWC to expand infrastructure onto those lots, yielding a 1MGD production capacity that is not useful for Summit-Fischer and that TWC says is not intended for external developments. At complete buildout on its 275 lots, Summit-Fischer could only ever use around .1MGD, which TWC says is the current production level. Thus, the cancellation and increased production would serve no useful purpose.
* It is the expansion of the water infrastructure, not the upgrade that requires TWC expansion onto the lots in question. TWC wants to take production capacity from .1MGD to 1MGD; however, an infrastructure upgrade does not require a ten-fold expansion of production capacity. Cancellation and expansion are unnecessary for improved service to Summit-Fischer.
* Cancellation of the lots has become the pathway for TWC expansion in an end run around the Summit-Fischer HOA. The non-resident landowner granted TWC a blanket easement on the lots; this would have enabled the expansive TWC project. However, faced with HOA legal opposition to that new easement, the landowner is now attempting cancellation of those lots from the subdivision.
* Cancellation would set a bad precedent, allowing a landowner who is not even a resident to cancel out of a subdivision against objections from the subdivision, in what may simply be a money-making scenario.
* Cancellation and the resulting 1MGD production would super-charge depletion of the Trinity Aquifer in our area, threatening wells and water supply of the entire community. Neighboring wells have already been impacted by low water in the aquifer.
* TWC says the 1MGD project at Summit-Fischer is "not intended to support Broken Cedar or other external developments." On the other hand, tomorrow's intentions may be different from today's. A 1MGD production capacity at Summit-Fischer would furnish roughly a 2500-home surplus beyond what Summit-Fischer will ever need. Where is that surplus intended to go? Cancellation of the lots and the resulting huge production capacity surplus would indeed enable Broken Cedar Ranch to move ahead, in the face of all but universal community opposition. Cancellation should not be allowed.
Voting NO on this cancellation is an opportunity for our Comal County Commissioners to stand with the community in protecting our water resources. This may also be the first best chance to oppose unsustainable growth in Comal County and to hold out for responsible growth that benefits everybody. We urge you to vote NO.
Posted: May 19, 2026
This article is taken from the SOS newsletter of May 19. See https://www.sosalliance.org to see the work of Save Our Springs Alliance and to subscribe to their newsletter.
Title: Call from Save Our Springs Alliance to Comment on the Draft 2027 State Water Plan
Help Shape the Future of Texas Water
Texas Water Development Board Is Planning for Massive Groundwater Expansion
The Draft 2027 State Water Plan lays out a future shaped by massive groundwater pumping, new pipelines, desalination plants, aquifer storage schemes, and explosive demand from sprawling development and data centers. State officials are projecting nearly $174 billion in future water infrastructure needs, and rural Texas aquifers are squarely in the crosshairs.
The Texas Water Development Board is accepting public comment right now, and this may be one of the few opportunities ordinary Texans have to get concerns on the record before these projects move from paper to reality.
If you care about your well, our creeks, our springs, our wildlife, or the future of water in Texas, now is the time to speak while it can still make a difference.
Bring Your Voice to the Water Board
Attend the public hearing on May 27, submit comments before May 29, and tell state officials that Texas water is not an unlimited commodity to be pumped, piped, and sold off without consequence. The people driving these projects are counting on silence, fatigue, and the assumption that nobody is paying attention. Let’s show them we are paying attention.
Public Hearing on the Draft 2027 State Water Plan
May 27, 2026, 1:00 PM
Stephen F Austin Bldg, 1700 N Congress Ave or virtually via Teams Meeting (Meeting ID: 280 904 566 316 4; Passcode: fp9Lk2bs. Audio access only: 512-298-6360; phone conference ID: 508 590 523#)
Written comments accepted through May 29, 2026
Posted: May 19, 2026
Title: Urgent: News coming out of Summit Estates at Fischer May Impact Broken Cedar Ranch
Summary:
Texas Water Company (TWC) is working to expand its wells at Summit Estates at Fischer and install a water treatment plant there.
The landowner of the Summit well lots (not a resident of the subdivision) changed the terms of TWC’s easement on those lots, in apparent violation of subdivision restrictions/HOA regulations, ignoring HOA barriers to TWC's expansion plans at Summit Estates.
The Summit Estates HOA is contesting that change of TWC’s easement.
If the easement change succeeds, these wells could become a water supply for Broken Cedar Ranch (as TWC reportedly has asserted its intention to pump out at least 10x more water from the aquifer than currently).
Neighboring wells in the area are threatened, at least one having already gone dry at current usage levels.
Comal Trinity GCD esteems that these wells are beyond its power to regulate because the wells were drilled before 2015, when CT GCD was formed.
The Summit Estates HOA is fighting this expansion of their wells and has retained legal counsel.
The Summit Estates HOA fight is intertwined with Fischer Neighbors' opposition to Broken Cedar Ranch: if the Summit wells are expanded, one barrier to Broken Cedar Ranch (lack of water) could be removed and TWC would be able to lift its pause on the development.
This situation has been ongoing for the last several months, with Summit Estates at Fischer solid in its opposition, but as of Thursday, May 14, things have taken a turn (item 12 on the May 14 Commissioners Court agenda).
The plot twist:
The landowner of the well lots (not a local resident) has petitioned the Comal County Commissioners to be allowed to withdraw his lots from Summit Estates at Fischer subdivision. This would have the effect of voiding all subdivision regulations and restrictions on his property. It is an end run around the Summit HOA's objections and would remove all obstacles to TWC's expansion of the wells in Summit Estates -- against the wishes of the subdivision.
The issue will be decided by the Comal County Commissioners.
A public hearing on the issue will be held during Commissioners Court, June 11, 8:30am at the Historic Courthouse, 100 Main Plaza, Second Floor, Main Courtroom, New Braunfels. Public comment is allowed at every Commissioners Court, each person allotted 3 minutes to speak.
We must let our commissioners know where the public stands on this issue, by writing or attending the public hearing. (Commissioner addresses are on our website and on the county’s website.)
We urge the Commissioners NOT to allow the landowner to arbitrarily cancel his lots out of Summit Estates at Fischer subdivision because:
that would enable TWC to bypass Summit Estates' wishes for its own wells,
it would have a harmful impact on the entire community even beyond Summit Estates, threatening our wells as construction on Broken Cedar Ranch development (including future phases) could proceed and aquifer depletion (already deemed unsustainable) would become super-charged,
this is an opportunity for our Commissioners to stand up for our water resources and for sustainable rather than irresponsible growth, and
it may set a bad precedent to allow a landowner who is not even a resident to cancel out of a subdivision, against objections from the subdivision, in what may simply be a money-making scenario.
Fischer Neighbors will be available Wednesday 5/20 and Tuesday 5/26, 4-6pm at Cupbearer Coffee in Hancock (across from Brookshire Brothers) to discuss. Drop in if you can!
Posted: May 14, 2026
Title: Draft 2027 State Water Plan - Water for Texas
Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) is now collecting public comments on the Draft State Water Plan for 2027. Public comment period ends May 29. A State Water Plan is done very 5 years; the current one is In draft phase now, to be accepted by end of 2026. Fischer Neighbors will be holding two evening sessions on how to send in comments and with suggestions:
Cupbearer Coffee, Hancock (across from Brookshire Brothers)
4-6pm
Wednesday, May 20 and Tuesday, May 26
See https://www.twdb.texas.gov/waterplanning/swp/index.asp
Posted: May 12, 2026
Title: Texas Water Company (TWC) plans well expansion at Summit Estates at Fischer
Subtitle: New source of water for local subdivisions (including Broken Cedar Ranch) and new draw-down on the Trinity Aquifer
Content: Texas Water Company is working to expand existing wells (promising to increase production by at least 1000%) and to install a water treatment plant at Summit Estates at Fischer in violation of deed restrictions and HOA requirements.
With this new source of water, the pause on Broken Cedar Ranch development would almost certainly end.
Fischer Neighbors is extremely concerned with the expansion of the wells in Summit Estates at Fischer and the corresponding much bigger draw-down on the Trinity Aquifer. Surrounding wells are already threatened with low water and some have already been abandoned for lack of water. This will also end the pause on the Broken Cedar Ranch development.
Thus, we support the Summit Estates at Fischer's opposition to TWC's expansion of the Summit Estates wells as integral to our opposition to Broken Cedar Ranch.
NB: These wells existed before 2015 and so the Comal Trinity Groundwater Conservation District (CT GCD) considers that they are not allowed to regulate these wells. This is where we need to write to our legislators and county commissioners -- to call for regularization of rules for GCDs across the state.
Additional Note: Fir Lane Well Station (Rancho del Lago) includes "rehabilitating" (read expanding) an existing well there and improving reliability and water pressure for the surrounding subdivisions: Rancho del Lago, the Legends, Rocky Creek, and Summit Estates at Fischer.
Proximity suggests that this expansion of services (expanded water production, treatment plant, and well station) also has Broken Cedar Ranch as an intended beneficiary.
Posted May 11, 2026
Title: Canyon Ranch: another permit for wastewater into Canyon Lake
Content: The Canyon Ranch Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) renewal permit application is currently open for public comment. This is a renewal application of an existing permit. A TCEQ Public Meeting has been scheduled for June 2 in Spring Branch:
Tuesday, June 2, 2026 at 7:00 PM
Hampton Inn Bulverde Texas Hill Country
499 Singing Oaks
Spring Branch, TX 78070
Public comment will be accepted until close of this meeting. Here is the link to send in a public comment - use permit # WQ0015866001: https://www14.tceq.texas.gov/epic/eComment/
Posted May 11, 2026
Title: See "A Region at a Crossroads: Canyon Lake Residents Rally Against Proposed Wastewater Plant" in the Bulverde-Spring Branch Highlights (see page 4):
April 12 Fischer Neighbors Fundraiser
Fischer Neighbors' first fundraiser took place at Fischer Hall, April 12 with a wonderful turnout on a breezy, drizzly day! The food was varied, delicious, and abundant; the musicians donated their time and talent to provide great accompaniment to a lovely afternoon; and we raised $9000!!!!!
Many, many thanks to those who attended, participated in the silent auction and raffle, and/or just donated, making this a wonderful event. It really helps us along our way to being able to afford the legal fees pending on our horizon. ($75,000 is the estimated cost if we reach a contested case hearing, which is our next goal.)
The generosity and concern of the community is overwhelming and illustrates the commitment to stop
the over-development of the Hill Country,
the unsustainable over-use of the Trinity Aquifer, and
the contamination of the water of Canyon Lake and the aquifer.
Our special thanks go to those who supported Fischer Neighbors and helped make the event a success:
Fischer Store School Community Center and the Agricultural Society of Fischer, who coordinated to allow our use of Fischer Hall;
the Greater Edwards Aquifer Alliance (GEAA) who lent us Nathan Glavy to manage the money at the event;
Danae Delaney, who organized and ran the silent auction for us;
Justin Sappington of Synergy in Sound, who donated the use of the sound equipment;
the musicians who donated their time and talent: Devin Baize, Michael Shane, Keegan Reed, and Drew Moreland.
We had many generous donors to the silent auction and raffle. Those include:
Attorney General Paxton concerned about PFAS
Texas Attorney General Kenneth Paxton's office just launched an investigation into Lululemon's potential use of toxic PFAS (so-called forever chemicals) in its activewear. The investigation is prompted by concern over the presence of the chemical compounds that may be associated with endocrine disruption, infertility, cancer, and other health issues.
These are the same PFAS that show up in treated wastewater unless non-traditional, special-purpose removal technologies are used.
Given the concern expressed by the attorney general's office over the presence of PFAS in activewear, we appreciate the concern that must be felt in that office over the presence of PFAS in Texans' drinking water.
We share that concern and are encouraged to see that the Attorney General seems to take seriously the adverse effects on health of these chemicals in our environment, including in our water.
Posted: April 13
Letters, Emails, and Calls
Please continue to contact your legislators and county commissioners, urging them to address the unsustainable water situation of the Texas Hill Country. Maybe send a monthly email, after a initial hardcopy letters and/or phone calls to their offices. (See addresses, emails, and phone numbers in the Take Action/Write or Call tabs.)
Suggestions: for letters or calls
identify yourself as a constituent;
be polite;
recommend the recipient take all possible action to protect the Hill Country and the Trinity Aquifer before both are irretrievably damaged (cite your own attachment to the area and observations on the present or pending damage);
request that Texas water management prioritize sustainability and use current facts on population growth, decline in rainfall, etc. rather than historic data;
request that the dysfunctional nature of Texas water management - actual accountability must become a serious part of the system;
request these three actions:
i) a ban on wastewater discharge in the Hill Country (the karst formations of the Hill Country cause wastewater to end up in the aquifer below, contaminating it);
ii) a pause on all large-scale (non-exempt) well permits in the Trinity Aquifer until sufficient studies have been completed and a credible plan for sustainability of the aquifer has been defined and adopted;
iii) that the Texas legislature convey authority to county commissioners to manage growth in the unincorporated areas of their own counties (county commissioners themselves must lobby the Texas legislature for such authority).
Posted: April 13
Timeline: We are still in the waiting period for TCEQ to reply to the public comments that were sent in and those expressed at the TCEQ Public Meeting Feb 10.
Once those replies are received, we will have 30 days to request a contested case hearing. If we are granted that, our work begins of preparing a solid case against Lennar's receiving the permit for the proposed Broken Cedar Ranch wastewater treatment facility and discharge into Potters Creek and Canyon Lake.
Posted: April 13
Commissioners Court public meetings
The Commissioners Court convenes in a regular session each Thursday at 8:30am in the Commissioners Courtroom in the Historic Courthouse, 100 Main Plaza, New Braunfels, Texas. The public is invited to attend in person or to stream the meetings or to view the recording afterwards. Agendas and videos are posted at https://www.comalcounty.gov/175/Agendas
Citizen comments are allowed at a specific time, each person being allotted 3 minutes.
Posted: April 16
Comal Trinity GCD Public Meetings
The Comal Trinity Groundwater Conservation District (GCD) Regular Board Meeting is scheduled for 6:00 PM on Monday, May 18, 2026, beginning with a workshop and continuing with the regular Board Meeting. It will be held at 9850 FM 311, Spring Branch, TX 78070 (Curtis W. Bremer Emergency Services #4, Building 6). The District invites the public to attend. Please contact District Staff at 830-885-2130 with any questions. The Agenda will be available at least three business days prior to the meeting on the District Information/Public Notices page.
Posted: April 16